The Blueprint blog
Inside magicplan
There are different ways to create floor plan sketches to get the job done, each with its own set of pros and cons. In this blog, we'll compare three common methods: traditional pen and paper, Bluetooth laser, and magicplan's LiDAR Auto-Scan. We'll dive into how each method works, how long they take, and how accurate they are. Whether you're a professional or not, knowing the strengths and weaknesses of each approach will help you choose the right one for your project.
The traditional method of drawing floor plans involves using tape measures and sketches. This approach has been around for a long time and relies on manual measurement and hand-drawn layouts.
This method is time-consuming and prone to human error. It can be cumbersome to juggle multiple tools, like a tape measure, pen, and paper while trying to take accurate measurements and draw precise layouts.
The Bluetooth laser method uses a laser distance measurer connected to an app for taking measurements. This method offers improved speed and accuracy compared to manual measurements.
This method is faster than using pen and paper, as it reduces manual measurement and data entry errors and it's more accurate. However, it still requires some manual inputs to ensure that all measurements are inserted correctly.
Learn more: Bluetooth Laser Distance Measurer Buying Guide
LiDAR technology allows for automatic room scanning, capturing detailed measurements quickly and accurately. This method uses the device’s LiDAR sensors to map out the space.
The LiDAR Auto-Scan method is significantly faster than both traditional and Bluetooth laser methods, often completing a scan in under a minute. It provides highly accurate measurements, making it an excellent choice for detailed and precise floor plans.
In this table, we'll compare the three methods based on key factors such as time, accuracy, and ease of use.
Pen and Paper | Bluetooth Laser | LiDAR Auto-Scan | |
Time Taken | 5+ minutes per room | 2-3 minutes per room | Less than 1 minute per room |
Accuracy | Prone to human error | 100% accuracy | Highly accurate, <1% error |
Ease of Use | Requires juggling multiple tools | Requires initial setup and some manual input | Very easy, minimal user effort |
Advantages | Low cost, no need for electronic devices | Faster than manual, improves accuracy | Fastest method, highly precise measurements |
Disadvantages | Time-consuming, labor-intensive, less accurate | Requires compatible device, some manual input | Requires compatible device, higher cost |
Each method has its strengths and weaknesses, and the best choice depends on your specific needs and resources. For quick and highly accurate floor plans, LiDAR Auto Scan is the superior option. However, for those on a tighter budget or without access to an iPhone with LiDAR technology, the traditional or Bluetooth Laser methods can still provide reliable results.
READ MORE:
Advanced Field Documentation: Elevating Project Reports
How to Build Effective SOPs for Any Job
Simplify Your Claims Process with magicplan and Xactimate® Integration
Benjamin Brown
Sales Consulting Manager